Stuart hall Critique of "Gucci x Dapper Dan Made in Harlem A/W '18–'19 BTS" using oppositional reading

 


Introduction to Stuart Hall's Theory and the Gucci x Dapper Dan Collaboration

    By applying Stuart Hall's oppositional reading framework to the Gucci x Dapper Dan Made in Harlem A/W '18–'19 collection, we explore the complex relationships between identity, power, and cultural appropriation. Fashion is a form of cultural expression that can be both a site of resistance and a mechanism of dominance. Hall's concept of encoding and decoding in media texts offers a lens through which to view this phenomenon. This partnership, which paired Harlem's own Dapper Dan with the luxury label Gucci, is a moving illustration of these relationships. In the 1980s, Dapper Dan, who was renowned for his avant-garde designs that reinvented luxury logos, was sued by companies such as Gucci for using their trademarks without permission.

   Gucci, however, recognised his impact in 2018 by reopening his Harlem atelier and launching a capsule collection as part of their partnership. Although some people applauded this collaboration, it also spurred discussions about ownership, authenticity, and the difficulties of cross-cultural communication.



Hall's Encoding/Decoding Model and Cultural Signification

    According to Stuart Hall's encoding/decoding model, audiences decode media texts in different ways after producers encode them with particular messages and values. Gucci's encoding of the partnership may have been meant as a celebration of Harlem's cultural influence and a nod to street fashion within the framework of the Gucci x Dapper Dan collection. However, audiences—especially those in the Black community—interpreted this message negatively, seeing it as a commodification of Black culture that did not receive enough credit or acknowledgement. 

   This decoding supports Hall's claim that Black popular culture is a "contradictory space" in which cultural forms are both objects of appropriation and manifestations of Black identity. Although the partnership recognises Dapper Dan's contributions, it also runs the risk of strengthening the very hierarchies of power that have historically disadvantaged Black artists. 


Cultural Appropriation vs. Cultural Exchange

   Dapper Dan has explained the difference between cultural appropriation and exchange, stressing the value of respect and reciprocity. According to him, exchange entails a reciprocal relationship, whereas appropriation is taking without giving.Gucci's collaboration with Dapper Dan raises concerns about whether it represents true cultural exchange or if it continues a trend of appropriation in which Black culture is exploited for financial gain without receiving fair credit.

    Hall's criticism of essentialist ideas about identity is reflected in this conundrum. Although "Blackness" can be a unifying signifier, Hall cautions against reifying it in ways that ignore the contradictions and complexity that are part of Black experiences. As a result, the Gucci x Dapper Dan partnership turns into a platform for these conflicts to be expressed, underscoring the difficulties of managing cultural representation in a commercialised environment.


Conclusion: Navigating Cultural Representation in Fashion

   One example of the intricacies of cultural representation in fashion is the Gucci x Dapper Dan Made in Harlem A/W '18–'19 collection. We learn from Stuart Hall's oppositional reading that fashion is intricately linked to questions of power, identity, and cultural ownership and is not just about aesthetics. The partnership highlights the continuous fight for equity and recognition that Black designers in the fashion industry face, even though it may have been meant as a celebration of Harlem's cultural impact.

   In the end, this case calls for a more thorough examination of the ways in which cultural narratives are created, appropriated, and contested, advocating for a more complex view of cross-cultural interactions that transcends surface-level interactions to tackle more profound concerns of representation and justice.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A CRITIQUE OF "THE SOCIAL NETWORK" USING STUART HALLS PERSPECTIVE/LENS

Image
INTRODUCTION     Stuart Halls lens comprises on the {dominant, negotiated and oppositional}, the; Dominant- they are the people that agree fully with the way the writer portrayed a character and or the  series of events in the film. they agree on the view the creator had while creating or rather encoding the film. Negotiated: These are the people that can agree but also have some complains about the point of view of the writer/creator, the way they made some certain things seem or even the way they portrayed a certain character. they just don't fully agree. Oppositional- they are very clear about their disagreement with the encoder of the film, they do not share the same view and they believe their view to be right and are solely against that of the creator/writer. These are the various lenses i will use to carefully critique this film.       Looking at the cultural context of the film, it was around the early 21st century (it reflects the rise of social me...
Read more

A STYLISTIC AND TECHNICAL REVIEW OF THE SOCIAL NETWORK: Alienation and Genius in Fincher’s Cinematic Code

Image
David Fincher’s rhythm in the Social Network dances to the volatility of Mark Zuckerberg, its protagonist. The flow of editing and pacing which was the work of Kirk Baxter and Angus Wall does not only create narrative forward thrusts, but sophisticated psychological frameworks. Zuckerberg’s Harvard dorms and the deposition rooms pulsating with mechanical precision like a metronome emphasizes scene leaps, reminiscent of Zuckerberg’s mind. Conversational exchanges delivered at a rapid pace are timed to not only Mark’s thinking emotionally detached but his emotional state. Amputation happens within three layers of time, trying to balance being present with the body's feelings, and balancing goals with what might happen as a result. Zuckerberg’s social inadequacies are reflected in the narrative’s rigid structure: recursive, cold and calculated. With every moment of stillness, distance increases, and we are vehemently pushed away into his psyche with every cut. The dissection is elabor...
Read more

Critique using bell hooks’ Intersectional Feminist Lens

Image
  The Feliz Navidad Nigeria ad presents a cheerful view of the holidays. It’s lively, enjoyable, and well-crafted. However, when examined through bell hooks' perspective, it becomes more complex. bell hooks urged us to consider representation: who gets seen, who gets heard, and who is left out. In this advertisement, the spotlight is on one stylish, happy woman in a sleek, modern environment. She seems to embody celebration itself. Yet, this polished image of joy overlooks much of Nigeria’s social reality. It depicts a narrow version of success—young, light-skinned, fashionable, and wealthy. This limited portrayal can feel detached from the daily lives of many Nigerians who do not share that lifestyle. Additionally, the ad does more than show joy; it sells it. The entire experience of Christmas is linked to appearances: the bright lights, the neat outfits, and the fancy setting. For bell hooks, this illustrates how consumerism shapes culture. The ad suggests that to be happy at Chr...
Read more